On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:34:14 +0530, Premshree Pillai
<premshree.pillai / gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:54:58 +0900, Lothar Scholz
> <mailinglists / scriptolutions.com> wrote:
> > Hello Premshree,
> >
> > PP> Very right. But I *tend* to call people who don't use dynamic,
> > PP> strong-typed languages losers. ;)

And just to clear things up, I wasn't very serious anyway, that's why the ";)".

> >
> > Can you please give me a hint about the language you have in mind.
> >
> > From my knowledge of around 25 languages it seems that only LISP with
> > heavy use of (the 'integer 'x) statements are both dynamic and strong
> > typed.
> >
> > Calling ruby users "losers" in this newsgroup is a little bit strange.
> > or do you mean "dynamic typed languages" ?
> 
> I'm a strong proponent of Ruby, I wouldn't say anything like that.
> 
> Ruby is dynamic and strong typed, isn't it? I have a feeling this
> discussion is going to head toward defining what typing means. :-S
> 
> >
> > --
> >  Best regards,                        emailto: scholz at scriptolutions dot com
> >  Lothar Scholz                        http://www.ruby-ide.com
> >  CTO Scriptolutions                   Ruby, PHP, Python IDE 's
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Premshree Pillai
> http://www.livejournal.com/~premshree
> 


-- 
Premshree Pillai
http://www.livejournal.com/~premshree