itsme213 wrote:

>>Still, could we not add a method to Method objects
> 
> This is where I get a bit lost. This information belongs with UnboundMethod
> objects, doesn't it? It would be fine to have indirect access to it via
> Method objects.

Well, I was talking about Methods in general e.g. both bound methods and 
unbound methods. Currently the naming of the classes is a bit confusing.

> I would very much like what Florian proposes. Could it please be made
> extensible so someone could add on other method and parameter meta-data they
> found useful?

I don't think there's more meta-data than the above.