Yukihiro Matsumoto ha scritto:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: Seeking info on keyword parameters"
>     on Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:16:33 +0900, "itsme213" <itsme213 / hotmail.com> writes:
> 
> |Will 2.0 make the names of keyword parameters available via reflection?
> 
> Unlike your expectation, 2.0 keyword arguments will look like
> Python's.  They are like "named optional arguments", rather than
> Smalltalk style method names.
> 
> 							matz.

maybe I'm reading too much in this message, but did you left the idea of 
having separated named arguments and default arguments ?