Hi --

On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, James Britt wrote:

> Well, even if that is the intention, it is not the behavior.
>
> gem update foo
>
> updates every gem, not just foo.

Whoops -- I didn't know that.  In spite of my mediocre track record on
reading David H.'s mind, I'll go out on a limb and speculate that he
didn't know it either :-)  Thanks for the clarification.  I hereby
withdraw the overreactive parts of my earlier post.  I've also chatted
with Jim W. and it does sound indeed like this silent discarding of
arguments to 'update' will disappear in the next release.


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack / wobblini.net