Andrew Walrond wrote:

>This is a long standing bug in Ruby, and has been reported hundreds of times 
>by myself and many other people, but never addressed. Unfortunately, the 
>usual response is "Give a small code example reproducing the problem", which 
>is impossible (given the nature of the bug), so it gets overlooked.
>  
>
No, the message alone doesn't say very much, because it's printed if a 
default case of the evluator is reached. So it's perfectly possible that 
every report of the hundred was caused by a different bug. That's why 
you and everyone that encounters it should provide a code example. And 
BTW, whining still isn't a substitute for that...

-- 
Florian Frank