David A. Black wrote:
> Hi --
> 
> I used to celebrate every 10000th message on this list, but that
> started to be sort of pointless as the volume increased.
> 
> However, I do wish to point out that Kent's message was #123456.
> 
> As the messages mount, and numerological coolness grows scarcer, we
> should savor such moments.

So, do you have a Ruby app that parses each message number and examines 
it for extra numerical flavor?



James