On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 22:42:25 +0900, Chuckl <Killian2422 / yahoo.com> wrote:
> I've also been thinking about deep_copy, but for a different reason. I
> want to keep a mutation log for each object instance. So if this
> occurs:

It's not quite the same as what you're saying (it's difficult to do a
true mutation log if your code doesn't write to a mutation log by
defaultt), but look at Transaction::Simple. It does live object
transactions and checkpointing.

-austin
-- 
Austin Ziegler * halostatue / gmail.com
               * Alternate: austin / halostatue.ca