James Britt ha scritto:

>> Further up on that same page Dave Winer says: "People ask if C# or
>> Java would be okay, and the answer is, of course. I basically meant
>> "compiled code" as opposed to interpreted code. Static instead of
>> dynamic. We have to cut to the metal."
>> http://archive.scripting.com/2004/12/02
> 
> 
> 
> But is this true?
> 
> Is this a case where one would have to honestly say, No, Ruby wouldn't 
> be a good choice?

Well, but ruby /is/ slow.. maybe a mixed code solution could fit..
Anyway I'd say "is this a place where smalltalk and common lisp would'nt 
cut?"
Don't let the compiled==fast==static meme pass ;)