Hans Fugal wrote: > Ah, well can tell you're not a mutt user. You're apparently comparing > gmail with a lame threading mail reader (or perhaps to slashdot or > other web forums). I don't blame you for thinking gmail is superior. > If you'd like I can send you a screenshot privately. Mutt does all of > the things you mentioned - sorts threads and subthreads > chronologically by last post, easy to see the overall tree and you > only read one message at a time, etc. Yep, I was actually thinking about Thunderbird. I still haven't made the leap to pure text-based email reading.