On Wednesday, December 1, 2004, 9:51:11 PM, Lothar wrote:

gr>> Btw, I hope matz will accept RCR 277 soon
gr>> http://rcrchive.net/rcr/show/277

> Again you get a "no" from me about RCR 277.

> I can't see any real value of your notation, it just makes the use of
> public even more unclear.

What on earth can be considered unclear about

  public def foo
    ...
  end

?
  
> I would instead vote for not even allow "public" to be state
> sensitive.

It's not state-sensitive; it just has a default behaviour and a
specific (i.e. when given an argument) behaviour.

Gavin