On Monday 15 November 2004 06:52 pm, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
| No, because of historical reasons, and the ability to distinguish
| between two different uses of "singleton".  (Besides, the Singleton
| Pattern has fallen foul of OO purists.)
|
| I say go for it, Matz.

I have an idea. How about a compromise. Rather then use the term 'singleton 
class' (the per object kind), lets use the slightly different term, 
'singular-class'. That's quite nearly the same, but is just different enough 
to prevent confusion.

Would that be alright with everyone? Matz?

T.