On Monday 15 November 2004 01:23 pm, Florian Gross wrote:
| trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:
| > On Monday 15 November 2004 12:28 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
| > | I'd call them singleton classes.  Any objection?
| > |
| > |        matz.
| >
| > Yes, cause of singleton pattern.
|
| Objection to the objection: The singleton pattern is not widely used in
| Ruby. Couldn't we rename the implementation of it? Maybe something like
| "SingleInstanceClass"?

Well, I just used it. And the rest of the OOP world knows Singleton, yes?

T.