trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

> On Monday 15 November 2004 12:28 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> | I'd call them singleton classes.  Any objection?
> |
> |        matz.
> 
> Yes, cause of singleton pattern.

Objection to the objection: The singleton pattern is not widely used in 
Ruby. Couldn't we rename the implementation of it? Maybe something like 
"SingleInstanceClass"?