Jamis Buck a ˝─rit :
> bruno modulix wrote:
> 
>> Well... If I tell you "Highly dynamic, hi-level, interpreted, garbage 
>> collected, file-based, strongly OO && mildly functional, clear syntax 
>> and fun to use", it could apply to both languages.
> 
> 
> You're right, except that (IMO) Python is not strongly OO. That's my 
> opinion.

A fact is a fact, whatever your opinion is. Please note that I didn't 
(and wouldn't) say that Python is a 'pure' OOPl.

(ok, I agree that the last two points ("clear syntax and fun to use") 
are more opinions than facts...)