dross / code-exec.net wrote: > jim / freeze.org wrote: > >> * Underbar Underbar <underbar_underbar / yahoo.com> [2004-10-31 >> 14:41:47 +0900]: >> >> >> >>> Anyway, to the ones who are the real aggitators(you >>> know who you are), the ones who like provoking people >>> to make them sound even worse, I can certainly make >>> ruby-talk a living hell for you if you keep iit up. As >>> I said the internet was secure, I can make ruby-talk a >>> bloody mess if you don't want to comply. >> >> >> Hmm, is this a threat or extortion? Or maybe it more like >> 'protection' for the neighborhood business. >> >> In any case, it sounds like it could lead to a jailable offense. >> I hope you reconsider. >> >> > > Bloody mess to them means they would see my every email. One click of > a script I created and automatically signs me up to one of several > free mail services(except the ones that use captchas. With a quick > viewing and type). And bada boom! > Newsgroups will work too. bada boom! >> >> >>> About my emails I usually send, they are always >>> written without emotion. I don't care how you >>> >> >> >> I assume this email is excluded.. >> >> >> >>> Sure, I agree with a certain person waiting to send >>> email, however I also wouldn't like to be called wrong >>> especially when I might be right. As said before, >>> attitude has nothign to do with stone cold facts. >>> Facts are facts, no matter the person bringing them >>> out. >>> >> >> >> You only had your assumption of the facts. You did not >> know the exact URLs, the RBL's used, the time they were queried or >> the voting system in effect. So any conclusions must >> have been based pieces of data you had and the rest filled >> in with your assumptions. Now your experience may >> give a lot of weight to your assessment, but there is so much >> missing data that anyone could make a case for reasonable doubt. >> I am surprised at your dogmatic statements that you were >> 100% right on this point. >> Surely a logical person like yourself can see the obvious fallacy >> in stating anything as being absolute. "There are no absolutes >> in science, abosolutely". :) >> >> >> >> > I had no assumptions, I viewed the emails and crossreferenced each > email to the topic listed in past emails. I had no assumptions, if I > did I wouldn't have sent the email. Also, I try my best to write > without emotion, I don't really get excited anymore, email are emails > are emails that contain information. No excitement here. > > David Ross > > > > David Ross -- Hazzle free packages for Ruby? RPA is available from http://www.rubyarchive.org/