On Tuesday 19 October 2004 04:22 pm, Florian Weber wrote:
| On Oct 19, 2004, at 16:52 Uhr, trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:
| > Nice. Thanks you for such a great reply! Very informative.
| >
| > Why do you avoid XSLT? Because it is slow? Or?
|
| you will run into tons of situations where xslt can't do what you
| wanna do, because it's based on xml.. and when it's possible
| you are either forced to duplicate code or using a even more
| verbose way of expressing what you wanna do..
|
| well, and sooner or later its verbosity will also annoy the hell out of
| you.
|
| personally i would never recommend anybody to use xslt if you
| are not absolutely forced to or doing something very simple.

That's too bad. So there is no _worthy_ standard declarative XML 
transformation language then? So much for standards. I will use Ruby. Thanks.

T.