What is the advantage of serving Rubyx through White Water rather
than, say, BitTorrent, which is much more common?

I think Rubyx might be interesting, but the obscure download method is
going to cause some people to just move on.

Bill

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:25:56 +0900, Andrew Walrond <andrew / walrond.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 Oct 2004 06:30, trans.  (T. Onoma) wrote:
> >
> > (I have one major caveat about Rubyx though, I don't like how all the
> > "packages" are stuffed into that one script.)
> 
> No longer the case :)
> 
> Andrew Walrond
> 
>