Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:01159] Re: Is this expected behavior?"
    on 00/01/21, Dave Thomas <Dave / thomases.com> writes:

|    p (1...10).end
|
|it should have been
|
|    p ((1...10).end)

Do you prefer

    p (1...10).end

for 

    p((1...10).end)

and

    p(1...10).end

for

    (p(1...10)).end

?  That was old parsing behavior.  And I'd like hear about

  a+b   => a+b
  a +b  => a(+b)
  a + b => a+b