On Monday 27 September 2004 08:49 pm, Florian Gross wrote:
> I'm not sure about this. (Is it needed frequently?) But right now I'd
> prefer Binding.of_caller to be in Ruby itself. After all it is needed
> for wrapping eval() and it can not be done with a pretty interface in
> plain Ruby. (It can be done in Ruby if you turn it inside out, e.g. make
> it yield a value instead of returning it.)

Binding.of_caller? Could you explain this more? I'm not sure to what you are 
referring.

Thanks,
T.