Markus a ˝─rit :
> On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 05:56, Kaspar Schiess wrote:
> 
>>Markus wrote:
>>
>>| Not bad at all.  Although I haven't read it yet myself, this looks like
>>| a quite reasonable summary.  I'm a little surprised at the absence of
>>| flugel and trisomatic, but perhaps WTLS has gotten less predictable in
>>| his vocabulary since the last time I read him.
>>
>>That post made me smile, since it was ambigous in its heading at the
>>very least. Do you actually like reading WTLS as much as you seem to be ?
> 
> 
>      I love reading his stuff.  I have, however, been asked to wait a
> day or two after reading anything he wrote before writing any
> documentation or client proposals.  I almost made one of our lawyers
> turn blue once, but the shade did not suit him.
> 
LOL