Ara.T.Howard / noaa.gov wrote:
> to my knowledge setup.rb is distinct, and probably more fully featured, 
> than
> install.rb.
> 
> in either case i've been using intall.rb and it doesn't solve the 'shebang'
> problem - does setup.rb handle the shebang issue?  if so i'll probably 
> start
> using it - i use install.rb because i have been.  ;-)

I'm not sure, but I think setup.rb (because it is more fully featured) has
replaced install.rb.

The reason I'm not sure is that I am not much of a packaging person. :/
My packaging tends to consist of "here's a tgz, unpack it and put it wherever
you want."  Yes, I need to break that habit.


Hal