ChrisO wrote:
> I'm tempted to type in the required Perl equivalent code here
> for the Foo class above for contrast, only no one here needs
> convincing.  I'm still shaking my head.  I'm certainly pretty
> much convinced.

I don't need convincing, but I'd be interested in seeing the equivalent Perl 
code just for the sake of comparison. I find it educational to see how 
different languages approach a problem.

Thanks,

-Mike