Erik Terpstra wrote:
> Daniel Berger wrote:
> 
>> I know E4X has been mentioned here in the past a couple times, but
>> it's been a while.  It seemed pretty neat to me.  Any thoughts?
> 
> 
> I like it, seems ideal for reading and writing configuration files in 
> XML, or 'per file' XML records.

I like it, too... but I'm wondering about conflicts between XML names
and existing Ruby methods. Or am I misunderstanding how it works?


Hal