I think both CDs and Bittorrents should be available.  Otherwise,
folks who are curious about ruby aren't going to watch them.  They
won't want to pony up cash to support a cause that they don't believe
in yet.

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 06:56:01 +0900, Gavin Sinclair
<gsinclair / soyabean.com.au> wrote:
> I've never used BT before and don't even know what it is.  But if
> someone wants to save bandwidth, that's their prerogative.  I'll
> learn.  Of course, someone else _might_ put the files up in full.
> 
> My suggestion: make the recordings available on CD for $X, money going
> to RubyCentral to help cover costs of the conference (and make a
> little on the side).
> 
> Not mutually exlusive, but I'd rather pay a fee to a worthy cause than
> slave over a download manager.
> 
> Cheers,
> Gavin
> 
> On Friday, September 10, 2004, 2:17:18 AM, Richard wrote:
> 
> > Please don't 'bittorrent-only' anything. There are those of use who
> > aren't involved in Bittorrent-anything.
> 
> > Thanks!
> 
> > -Rich
> 
> > On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:35:42 +0900, Chad Fowler <chadfowler / gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:08:22 +0900, Richard Kilmer <rich / infoether.com> wrote:
> >> > We are going to have my buddy's audio mixing board, a wireless mic, and a
> >> > pre-amp.  We can run the board into a camera also directly into a laptop to
> >> > record directly to MP3.  I am gonna try and confirm borrowing a projector,
> >> > since my company does not own one itself.  So, we will be set this year re:
> >> > getting solid recordings of the talks and be able to post things up quickly.
> >> > Actually, getting a list of sites before hand that would host these MP3's of
> >> > the conference would make it far easier to post quickly.
> >> >
> >>
> >> We can obviously put them on the rubyconf website, though I'm thinking
> >> this is a good bittorrent-only kind of thing.
> >>
> >> Chad
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On 9/9/04 8:49 AM, "Gavin Sinclair"
> >> <gsinclair / soyabean.com.au> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > That being the case, is it possible to try and get plain audio
> >> > > recordings as well?  I mean, shoot for video, but someone else can be
> >> > > recording audio, which will be better than nothing if the video
> >> > > doesn't turn out well.
> >> > >
> >> > > Cheers,
> >> > > Gavin
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> 
>