Richard Lyman wrote:
> Please don't 'bittorrent-only' anything. There are those of use who
> aren't involved in Bittorrent-anything.

I'm not really familiar with BT since I don't usually deal with giant
files like that.

But I thought it was a server-side issue, am I wrong? Shouldn't anyone
be able to access a file served vis BT?


Hal



> Thanks!
> 
> -Rich
> 
> 
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:35:42 +0900, Chad Fowler <chadfowler / gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:08:22 +0900, Richard Kilmer <rich / infoether.com> wrote:
>>
>>>We are going to have my buddy's audio mixing board, a wireless mic, and a
>>>pre-amp.  We can run the board into a camera also directly into a laptop to
>>>record directly to MP3.  I am gonna try and confirm borrowing a projector,
>>>since my company does not own one itself.  So, we will be set this year re:
>>>getting solid recordings of the talks and be able to post things up quickly.
>>>Actually, getting a list of sites before hand that would host these MP3's of
>>>the conference would make it far easier to post quickly.
>>>
>>
>>We can obviously put them on the rubyconf website, though I'm thinking
>>this is a good bittorrent-only kind of thing.
>>
>>Chad
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>On 9/9/04 8:49 AM, "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair / soyabean.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>That being the case, is it possible to try and get plain audio
>>>>recordings as well?  I mean, shoot for video, but someone else can be
>>>>recording audio, which will be better than nothing if the video
>>>>doesn't turn out well.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Gavin
>>>
>>>
>>
>