Hi,

In message "Re: OK... :) question about hash and array literals"
    on Sat, 4 Sep 2004 12:54:52 +0900, Hal Fulton <hal9000 / hypermetrics.com> writes:

|Is there a method that does get called (I think not), or could
|in theory such a thing be implemented?

Not planned, just because changing semantics of literals are too
dangerous, as dangerous as macros for my eyes.

							matz.

p.s.
I'm thinking of preserving Hash order by not re-implement it by using
Tree or something, but by saving key order information along with hash
tables.