> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> 
> > So candidates are:
> > 
> >   (a) Hash#values, Array#values
> >   (b) Hash#values_for, Array#values_for
> >   (c) Hash#values_for, Array#values_at
> >   (d) Hash#at, Array#at
> >   (e) Hash#values, Array#elements
> >   (f) Hash#subset, Array#subset
> >   (g) Hash#selections, Array#selections
> >   (h) Hash#collect_indexes, Array#collect_indexes
> > 
> > Did I miss any propsal from you guys?
> 

David Alan Black added:

>    (i) Hash#values_for, Array#elements_at

My vote(s) go for choice i, or if in the end game it's considered too long,
I'd revert to

     (j) Hash#values,     Array#elements

	- Aleksi