On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Reimer Behrends wrote:

> And yes, this requires additional effort. But your message is only
> written once, and read a thousand times. If everybody does it this way,
> any additional time spent on your part is offset many times over by
> others saving _your_ time in the same fashion.

Excellent point.

I've seen some people say that they either put the new material at the top
or intersperse. I'd say that messages should always be interspersed, and a
single response isn't an exception to this.

This message is a good example. :) If you had another point, then I could
quote you below:

> [another point]

then add some more. But since you didn't make that other point, there's no
reason I should move all this to the top. :)

-- 
  spwhite / chariot.net.au