On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:05:33 +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote

> I found CVS performance acceptable. The website, however, is 
> typically slow. The problem, I think, is not so much the actual 
> speed of the server or the line, but that it looks like the pages 
> are highly complex and not cached (and neither are the images?) in 
> any way. It's bad when I can see Firefox rendering each element 
individually.

Now, from my high bandwidth, high latency access (satellite internet), the 
web site's performance has been quite acceptable every time I have tried it 
over the weekend and so far this week.  Seems to be working well.


Kirk Haines