Kirk Haines <khaines / enigo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:47:13 +0900, Martin DeMello wrote
> 
> > Thanks, I'll take a look. I'm more interested in static page generation
> > than in webapps per se, so I'd thought it'd be overkill for my purposes.
> 
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you are looking for, to.  Can you explain a 
> little more what you are looking for?  Are you talking about pages with 90% 
> static content and a little dynamic stuff here or there?  The stuff that is 
> not completely static but falls well short of a full fledged web application?

That too, but mostly static sites generated from dynamic content (i.e.
if the content changes, the relevant pages are simply regenerated, but
from a websurfer's point of view it's static). I keep thinking that
there has to be something better than HTML/CSS to write the view in,
even if I can't come up with it myself. So far I've looked at
ClearSilver and Amrita, which didn't quite have the 'high level' feel I
was looking for, Velocity, which came close but I'd prefer something
that operated better with Ruby, and CGI.rb which got ugly very fast for
complex pages (maybe I was doing it wrong, though).

martin