* David Ross <drossruby / yahoo.com> [0741 14:41]:
> > 5.2.1 *isn't* classed as stable - it might work but
> > if it goes bang you
> > have only yourself to blame. It was released because
> > they wanted to get some
> > of 5 out of the door (I'm using it because my
> > brothers a committer and 
> > he happened to give me a CD set when I was building
> > my last box, and at 
> > that point NetBSD firewire and usb2 was too shaky to
> > use).
> 
> 
> OK. please do not answer again, you are trolling. It
> is really stable already. You need to go do some
> research on how many servers are using FreeBSD 5.x on
> servers already, kthnx. 

wtf is wrong with you? 

trolling my ass - I run it. I like it.
(I've been advocating it for 5 frigging years.)
So do most of the BSDers I know.

> Commiter big deal... whoever
> wrote the old code in FreeBSD needs to get their head
> exampled. Asomdai is having to go through all the code

He's a doc committer. Thats how he gets free releases.

[snip]

> > 5.3 will be officially stable - if you want a
> > production box use 4.10 for
> > now and wait for 5.3.
> > 
> 
> I am fully aware of this. Its on the main site Thanks again.

So why am i trolling when I say the same thing?
Get over yourself mate.

-- 
Intolerance is the last defense of the insecure.
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns