In article <478c16ae040720123626c63bc1 / mail.gmail.com>,
Edgardo Hames  <ehames / gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:01:50 +0900, Mark Hubbart <discord / mac.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Or how about this: Ruby is dual-licensed; it can be used under the Ruby
>> license terms, or under the LGPL. Would it be problematic to add the
>> BSD license in the mix?
>> 
>
>Is that allowed by the mix-in mechanism supported by Ruby ;-)
>
>Ed
>
>

module LGPL
....
end

module RubysOwn
....
end

module BSDLicense
....
end

class RubyLicense
  include LGPL
  include RubysOwn
  include BSDLicense
end



....seems to work  ;-)

Phil