> Please don't take this as a criticism.  I am asking 
> because I thought Ruby's license was said to allow
> commerical exploitation (even closed source).  And
> so I'm curious if this is your impression too, or
> what
> additional safeguards or clauses make the BSD
> license
> preferable for your purposes?

 
> I find this perplexing.  I thought open source
> wasn't doing a good job of being open source if you
> had to be wary of reading it for legal reasons?

I want to make sure my code stays under the BSD
license. Ruby's license confuses me a bit. --David Ross


		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail