Aha. I'll look into it, thanks. 

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 05:54:48 +0900, Austin Ziegler <halostatue / gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 05:24:52 +0900, Claus Spitzer
> <docboobenstein / gmail.com> wrote:
> > Alright, understandable. Now the one question that remains (sorry for
> > being nit-picky) is if it would be possible to desonstruct objects.
> > After all, there has to be some place (possibly the metaclass) where
> > it says that Foo.bar
> >
> > class Foo
> >  def bar( in )
> >    in + 1
> >  end
> > end
> >
> > does in+1, right? Cheers
> 
> I'm not understanding your question. Ruby interprets the code into an
> AST; if you know how to read the AST, then you may be able to figure
> that out. However, you're not going to be able to do that in Ruby
> "proper" (you'll need something like evil.rb which uses Ruby/DL, or
> some of the other tools out there).
> 
> -austin
> --
> Austin Ziegler * halostatue / gmail.com
>                * Alternate: austin / halostatue.ca
> 
>