Hi --

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Robert Klemme wrote:

> 
> "David A. Black" <dblack / wobblini.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:Pine.LNX.4.44.0407120755490.11648-100000 / wobblini...
> >
> > I would emulate the built-in/standard library style as much as
> > possible, i.e., no company names and a General::Specific::MoreSpecific
> > nest.
> >
> > If company names absolutely must enter into it, it would be better to
> > put them at the other end; I'd rather "require
> > 'xml/parsers/AcmeXMLCo'" than 'AcmeXMLCo/xml/parser'.  The former is
> > not ideal, but it's less disruptive and less ungainly than the latter.
> 
> But having the company name as prefix makes installation easier, because
> otherwise if your package consists of several modules you'll have to
> manage several sub folders.

Yes, but all for the common good.  I don't see the names of Matz's
company, or those of other core developers, in the standard library.


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack / wobblini.net