il Fri, 09 Jul 2004 14:02:46 +0200, Kristof Bastiaensen
<kristof / vleeuwen.org> ha scritto::

>On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:52:17 +0000, gabriele renzi wrote:
>
>> 
>> usually people seem to think that ruby is smalltalk or lisp or perl
>> done properly. Probably all of this are just unlambda done properly :)
>
>FYI, I have written a unlambda interpreter in Ruby.  (I don't know
>if I should be proud of it...)  It was ridiculously easy, because
>Ruby already provides everything (continuations, closures,...). I think
>the implementation is even easier to understand than the spec.
>It is not a very efficient implementation, since it uses recursion.
>But you don't have very large unlambda programs that you absolutely
>need to run, do you?

:)))
I wa thinking to write an unlambda interpreter just after my exams'
session , end of july ;)

Damn, now I have to write the COW one.. 
givent that brainf**k and OOk! are already there maybe we should start
a section on the wiki :)