Hi,

At Sun, 4 Jul 2004 12:07:13 +0900,
Carl Youngblood wrote in [ruby-talk:105201]:
> Okay, forgive me for my ignorance but I thought a "ruby extension"
> meant taking some library that was written in C and making its
> functionality accessible from within ruby.  The thing is, I'd rather
> not have to do any compiling or anything to install my extension.  I'd
> like to simply check that the required shared library is in the path,
> grab it and create a ruby-style wrapper class for it without needing
> to do any compiling.  Is there a better way to do this than using
> Ruby/DL?

Well, I guess it would be possible but wouldn't be called
"extension library".  We may need a new name.

-- 
Nobu Nakada