On Monday 28 June 2004 01:33, ts wrote:
> >>>>> "S" == Sean O'Dell <sean / celsoft.com> writes:
>
> S> I did it, and it worked like I said it could.  I didn't say Matz would
> accept S> it or want it.  In fact, I know from looking at the Ruby
> internals it would S> be very hard to make totally stable, so I wouldn't
> want it accepted myself,
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> S> not until a lot of code was bullet-proofed internally.
>
> S> So, I'm not sure what your point is.  Are you annoyed that it worked?
>                                                               ^^^^^^^^^
>  no comment

I'm going to ask this one time, and please everyone forgive me for going 
off-topic, but could you leave out the personal stuff when we're talking 
about Ruby?  You and Ziegler both have a habit of being very nasty with me.  
Let's discuss Ruby without the personal nastiness, could we?

	Sean O'Dell