"Paul Brannan" <pbrannan / atdesk.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:20040616174712.GB2788 / atdesk.com...
> > Alternative solutions could make use of WeakReference somehow,
> > although this is just a faint idea - nothing concrete.
>
> If I understand you correctly you are talking about solving the problem
> of wanting some part of the code to be able to modify an object but some
> other part of the code to not be able to do this.

I rather thought along the lines of having cached data be referenced by a
WekRef so it can be discarded.  But the WeakRef then must be able to
change, which it can't at the moment.

Regards

    robert