Gregory Millam wrote:
> And lo, daz wrote:
>
> To note: The thread for this topic ('undefine') loooks like this
>
> undefine (Original)
> Re: undefine
> Re: undefine
> Re: undefine
> undefine (Tony Summerfelt's reply)
> undefine (ditto)
> Re: undefine
> Re: undefine
> undefine (Summerfelt again)
> Re: undefine
>

It has over 60 messages and looks like this:
http://www.d10.karoo.net/misc/threading.png

>
> Most email clients are easily capable of doing "correct" threading.
> But this isn't what Josh meant. My own client (Sylpheed Claws) excels at this.
>
> - Walker
>
>

daz