On Wednesday, June 16, 2004, 5:14:55 AM, Austin wrote:

> Rather, I am suggesting that *competition* in this case may not be
> the best approach, where *cooperation* works far better.

I wouldn't worry about that point too much.  It's a pretty simple
package (not to belittle it) and if Nathaniel is interested in the
functionality, he knows where to find it.

From what Sean has said, co-operation isn't the best option to satisfy
his requirements, and that's reasonable.

Gavin