"Claus Spitzer" <DocBoobenstein / gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:a7c2a81904061215063143a796 / mail.gmail.com...
> well yes... It's just part of the procedural-->OO shift that everyone
> needs to go through at some point.

In fact this has nothing to do with procedural vs. OO.  The way how
variables (locations) and values are related is completely orthogonal to the
nature of the language (procedural or OO).

Regards

    robert


>
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 06:48:37 +0900, Robert Klemme <bob.news / gmx.net>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > "Claus Spitzer" <DocBoobenstein / gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> > news:a7c2a81904061213093afcb11b / mail.gmail.com...
> > > I concur.
> > >  It's probably easier if you think of a variable as just a pointer to
> > > an object, not as the objects themselves.
> >
> > Maybe it's easier because it's more accurate?  ;-)
> >
> >     robert
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 04:48:36 +0900, Robert Klemme <bob.news / gmx.net>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "tony summerfelt" <snowzone5 / hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> > > > news:p3hmc0p6h00cq59vcl6jk0f61r9ir3gl4e / 4ax.com...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > is there a way to undefine a variable?
> > > >
> > > > like
> > > >
> > > > x = nil
> > > >
> > > > Note: defined? does not have the same importance as in Perl.
> > > >
> > > >     robert
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>