well yes... It's just part of the procedural-->OO shift that everyone
needs to go through at some point.

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 06:48:37 +0900, Robert Klemme <bob.news / gmx.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> "Claus Spitzer" <DocBoobenstein / gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:a7c2a81904061213093afcb11b / mail.gmail.com...
> > I concur.
> >  It's probably easier if you think of a variable as just a pointer to
> > an object, not as the objects themselves.
> 
> Maybe it's easier because it's more accurate?  ;-)
> 
>     robert
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 04:48:36 +0900, Robert Klemme <bob.news / gmx.net>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > "tony summerfelt" <snowzone5 / hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> > > news:p3hmc0p6h00cq59vcl6jk0f61r9ir3gl4e / 4ax.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > > is there a way to undefine a variable?
> > >
> > > like
> > >
> > > x = nil
> > >
> > > Note: defined? does not have the same importance as in Perl.
> > >
> > >     robert
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
>