Martin DeMello <martindemello / yahoo.com> wrote:
> You might be better off with a thread per loop, then, which fills an
> entry into a global array or hash when its particular job finishes. That
> way, if you want you can start processing files as they come in, and not
> block on waiting for the next in sequence to get done.

That's not something I've encountered yet.
Are there any on-line examples I could take a look at, to see
how it works?
Thanks.

-- 
www.sirwilliamhope.org