Hi --

On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Hal Fulton wrote:

> Semantics, James Thurber notwithstanding, is not a town in Ohio.
> 
> I think when Rich says "semantics" he means something that can't
> really be checked by a machine -- the "purpose or function," as it
> were.

Yeah, I think you're right.  I'd been interpreting the term as a kind
of collective reference to things like signature, return type, etc.
(which is why I'd had trouble finding any of them in Ruby methods :-)


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack / wobblini.net