David A. Black wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Simon Strandgaard wrote:
> > Robert Klemme wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > > 
> > > "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye / adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> > > news:20040602230945.768b8989.neoneye / adslhome.dk...
> > > > Regexp.new is old, and relies on C'ish magic values.
> > > >
> > > > Lets write something ugly with the current initialize:
> > > > Regexp.new('a.*a', 5, 'U')
> > > > Thats the same as /a.*a/uxim
> > 
> > Robert, +1 ??
> 
> I think +1 means "I vote yes" (or in this case perhaps, "I will vote
> yes when the RCR is submitted on RCRchive" :-)
> 
> I also like the idea of discarding these cryptic Regexp things.  

ok.. apparently +1 translates into 'i vote yes'..   I guessed so.
Just wanted to point out my that the value 5 was sligthly wrong.
It should have been 7.   5+1 would only be 6 (halfway).

I better fill in an rcr for this. 

--
Simon Strandgaard