On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Dave Thomas wrote:

> > What would be nice would be to produce a SciTE .api file for the Ruby base
> > libraries... then calltips would work.
> 
> We hope to release them in XML form as soon as some legalities are
> cleared away. That'll put them a mere XSLT away.
> 
> However, it might not be plain sailing. What can you do about
> overloaded method names?

SciTE seems to ignore all but the first definition for each method.  Is
overloading of that sort very common, though?  Obviously it can't happen
within a class...