> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Garamond [mailto:lists / zara.6.isreserved.com] 
> Eric Hodel wrote:
>>> The assert_follows_spec() could even perform several
>>> iterations of tests if wanted, to test deterministic-ness.
>> If you've got a spec like this, why not write a method to
>> autogenerate test methods?
> Why is that better than something like assert_follows_spec()? 
> It's not more readable IMO, it's not shorter, it adds an additional
> step in the Makefile/build process.

It doesn't have to be, in Ruby, and I think that it is more readable --
in Ruby.

-austin
--
austin ziegler * austin.ziegler / evault.com