daz wrote:
>
> ============================================================
> Anyone looking at header differences, please save your time.
> ============================================================
>

====================================================================
Anyone looking for a remote cave to hide in, please stand behind me.
====================================================================

Still, if anyone can explain why I can post with "In-Reply-To:"
but without "References:" in the headers but Dennis can't, please
post a reference so that I can check it in 20 years time (if I
choose to re-emerge).


#====================================================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
X-received-from: This message has been automatically forwarded from
                 the ruby-talk mailing list by daz (testing).
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 00:00:37 +0900
From: "David A. Black" <dblack / wobblini.net>
Subject: Re: separating ruby-talk from comp.lang.ruby?
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405310800060.20545-100000 / wobblini>
In-Reply-To: <331CC851-B0A9-11D8-8836-000A95676A62 / pragprog.com>
X-ML-Name: ruby-talk
X-Mail-Count: 101890
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-ruby-talk: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405310800060.20545-100000 / wobblini>
X-rubymirror: yes

Sorry everyone, testing again....  small meaningless tweak to
headers....

--
David A. Black
dblack / wobblini.net


#====================================================================================================



daz