Hi --

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, ts wrote:

> >>>>> "R" == Robert Klemme <bob.news / gmx.net> writes:
> 
> R> "daz" <dooby / d10.karoo.co.uk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> R> news:003201c447f3$7bfb2c60$b3a1f9d5 / vanna...
> 
> >> BTW: That post (your long reply to my long reply) was one that
> >> didn't get to the ML.  So the new problem continues.  Hmm...
> 
> R> Are you saying that although D&D tackled one problem we seem to have
> R> another problem here?  Is it
> 
>  Well, for me, your response to "daz" <dooby / d10.karoo.co.uk> was
>  [ruby-talk:101969] 
> 
>     Message-Id: <2i30srFifc29U1 / uni-berlin.de>

I think that was a different one.  The one that seems to be missing started
like this (as cut-and-pasted from gnus):

  Subject: Re: separating ruby-talk from comp.lang.ruby?
  Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
  Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 13:45:01 +0200


  I'm not proficient with NNTP so I'll just try to throw some common sense in.
  Maybe we can dig up the reason in a joined efford.  Read on...


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack / wobblini.net